Original Reddit post

Hey 👋 Quick project showcase. I built a skill for Claude (works with Codex and Antigravity as well) that turns your IDE into something you’d normally pay an SEO agency for. You type something like “run a full SEO audit on mysite.com” and it goes off scanning the whole website. runs 17 different Python scripts, llm parses/analyzes the webpages and comes back with a scored report across 8 categories. But the part that actually makes it useful is what happens after: you can ask it questions. “Why is this entity issue critical?” “What would fixing this schema do for my rankings?” “Which of these 7 issues should I fix first?” It answers based on the data it just collected from your actual site, not generic advice. How to get it running: git clone https://github.com/Bhanunamikaze/Agentic-SEO-Skill.git cd Agentic-SEO-Skill ./install.sh --target all --force Restart your IDE session. Then just ask it to audit any URL. What it checks: 🔍 Core Web Vitals (LCP/INP/CLS via PageSpeed API) 🔍 Technical SEO (robots.txt, security headers, redirects, AI crawler rules) 🔍 Content & E-E-A-T (readability, thin content, AI content markers) 🔍 Schema Validation (catches deprecated types your other tools still recommend) 🔍 Entity SEO (Knowledge Graph, sameAs audit, Wikidata presence) 🔍 Hreflang (BCP-47 validation, bidirectional link checks) 🔍 GEO / AI Search Readiness (passage citability, Featured Snippet targeting) 📊 Generates an interactive HTML report with radar charts and prioritized fixes How it’s built under the hood: SKILL.md (orchestrator) ├── 13 sub-skills (seo-technical, seo-schema, seo-content, seo-geo, …) ├── 17 scripts (parse_html.py, entity_checker.py, hreflang_checker.py, …) ├── 6 reference files (schema-types, E-E-A-T framework, CWV thresholds, …) └── generate_report.py → interactive HTML report Each sub-agent is self-contained with its own execution plan. The LLM labels every finding with confidence levels (Confirmed / Likely / Hypothesis) so you know what’s solid vs what’s a best guess. There’s a chain-of-thought scoring rubric baked in that prevents it from hallucinating numbers. Why I think this is interesting beyond just SEO: The pattern (skill orchestrator + specialist sub-agents + scripts as tools + curated reference data) could work for a lot of other things. Security audits, accessibility checks, performance budgets. If anyone wants to adapt it for something else, I’d genuinely love to see that. I tested it on my own blog and it scored 68/100, found 7 entity SEO issues and 3 deprecated schema types I had no idea about. Humbling but useful. 🔗 github.com/Bhanunamikaze/Agentic-SEO-Skill ⭐ Star it if the skill pattern is worth exploring 🐛 Raise an issue if you have ideas or find something broken 🔀 PRs are very welcome submitted by /u/Illustrious-triffle

Originally posted by u/Illustrious-triffle on r/ClaudeCode