Original Reddit post

You used to need a lawyer to draft a contract. A designer to build a brand. A dev team to ship software. Now you just need to know what to ask in plain english. But knowing what to ask is harder than it sounds. It is like asking a stranger for help without knowing what they actually know. Ask the wrong way and you get a CONFIDENT wrong answer. Models are improving biweekly so this post might not make sense in 3-4 years. We build full software platforms using an AI model we finetuned and taught our language and our architecture. Our production architectures and different full projects we built are also fed into it. Now we have an idea what the model knows and can talk and pinpoint things we need when creating a new project so that the output is more refined. Auth, payments, common features…it already knows OUR patterns so we skip straight to what matters for the client when building new projects or scaling any. When everyone can get assisted by AI, what actually sets the good results apart from the rest? I think it comes down to the foundation you bring into the conversation. A lawyer who feeds AI 10 of their own contracts gets to 95%. Someone who opens ChatGPT cold gets to 60%. Same tool, completely different result. The AI is only as good as the context you give it. submitted by /u/Ejboustany

Originally posted by u/Ejboustany on r/ArtificialInteligence