I’m one of those people who has come to believe that AI job displacement is inevitable and UBI is a possible out. But reading this paper, it occurred to me that how UBI is funded and the architecture around it is as important as UBI itself. Any dole out or aggressive taxation doesn’t seem to change the social contract needed in the post-AI world. The paper is just math for now — self-funding UBI with no income tax that reaches a stable equilibrium with adequate funding for government, lending, and money supply. What’s interesting is that the six rules in the paper are designed so that everyone’s competing interests — individuals, government, savers, borrowers — actually produce stability rather than conflict. Money is created by every living person just for existing. I think there are better minds in this forum to say if this is just another random s***t from a random person on the internet or something substantive. Either way, given so many posts on AI job displacement, I thought I’d throw this in the mix. submitted by /u/Strict_Cabinet8793
Originally posted by u/Strict_Cabinet8793 on r/ArtificialInteligence