I keep thinking about a possible paradox in the current AI race. Many CEOs and founders are pushing aggressively to integrate AI everywhere because it increases short-term efficiency and profit right? But if AI keeps improving and becomes widely accessible, what once required a team of engineers, designers, and capital could increasingly be done by a single person(or very small teams) with good ideas and the right tools. So more people can build alternatives, competition increases dramatically and prices will tend to fall. So the same technology that boosts profits today might undermine the scarcity that many companies rely on tomorrow. Is this a logically consistent concern, or am I missing something in this reasoning? submitted by /u/BinaryMode00
Originally posted by u/BinaryMode00 on r/ArtificialInteligence