honestly, i kind of rawdog my approach to vibecoding. i’d call it a “caveman” approach, but it works for me. basically, the only claude features i use are skills and the CLAUDE.md file. i’m not sure if i’m shooting myself in the foot by doing this, but i’m so used to generating good results with this workflow that i’m scared to ruin it by implementing things like hooks, MCPs, the ralph wiggum technique, etc. (i’m assuming these are already outdated because things move fast.) i guess it doesn’t hurt to try, and one fear of mine is falling behind with AI tools and becoming a “boomer” in a sense — like i’ll sit there and manually auto-approve everything claude spits out. i know some people who will just let claude do its thing for hours without interacting with it once. my question is: which approach is better? the caveman approach, or utilizing all resources from claude and being very disconnected from the codebase because claude is doing everything? i guess at the least, i could be utilizing subagents and making that part of my approach. submitted by /u/newmenewyea
Originally posted by u/newmenewyea on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.