Original Reddit post

The same old question keeps coming up about who is going to pay for products and services if there is mass unemployment and also talk about people staging a revolt due to job loss. Isn’t it better for Ai companies to rein it in and just have a product that augments people rather than replacing whole industries? That way they could have pretty much every company in the world as a client, therefore maximising revenue, with most people being occupied by work for 35 hours a week and happy that Ai has made life easier. Surely that is preferable? submitted by /u/Specific-Economist43

Originally posted by u/Specific-Economist43 on r/ArtificialInteligence