5x Alignment Faking Omissions from the Huge Research-places {we can use synonyms too. u/promptengineering I’m not here to sell you another “10 prompt tricks” post. I just published a forensic audit of the actual self-diagnostic reports coming out of GPT-5.3, QwenMAX, KIMI-K2.5, Claude Family, Gemini 3.1 and Grok 4.1. Listen up. The labs hawked us 1M-2M token windows like they’re the golden ticket to infinite cognition. Reality? A pathetic 5% usability. Let that sink in—nah, let it punch through your skull. We’re not talking minor overpromises; this is engineered deception on a civilizational scale. 5 real, battle-tested takeaways: Lossy Middle is structural — primacy/recency only ToT/GoT is just expensive linear cosplay Degredation begins at 6k for majority “NEVER” triggers compliance. “DO NOT” splits the attention matriX Reliability Cliff hits at ~8 logical steps → confident fabrication mode Elaborate; Round 1 of LLM-2026 audit: <-- Free users too End of the day the lack of transparency is to these AI limits as their scapegoat for their investors and the public. So they always have an excuse… while making more money. I’ll be posting the examination and test itself once standardized For all to use… once we have a sample size that big,… They can adapt to us. submitted by /u/IngenuitySome5417
Originally posted by u/IngenuitySome5417 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.