My daughter’s dad is a programmer and has been experimenting with OpenClaw lately. He set up a few skills for me because I’ve been spending time with AI music tools and related content workflows. What I didn’t expect was this: AI isn’t just changing what I can make. It’s starting to change how I decide what’s worth making in the first place. At first I assumed the main impact would be generation. Instead, the more interesting shift has been around selection:
- which ideas feel worth exploring
- which outputs feel worth keeping
- which discussions feel worth entering
- which directions feel like noise vs signal That feels like a bigger change than I expected. What makes it more obvious is that the people around me seem to interact with the same process in completely different ways. He sees workflows, automation, and systems. I think more in terms of themes, framing, and whether something feels worth developing. My daughter has a much simpler test: “Do I want to hear it again?” That contrast keeps making me think one of AI’s biggest long-term effects may not just be on output, but on human judgment and selection. Not replacing those things entirely — but shaping them. Curious if anyone else has noticed that shift in their own workflows. submitted by /u/Ok_Resolution_3314
Originally posted by u/Ok_Resolution_3314 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.