I’ve been working on an app based on the premise that ideas with high fidelity high density, and no contradictions (aka ‘low friction’) act as seed thoughts for elaborate ideas. As they are functionally the output result of complex thought. just like ‘e=mc(squared)’ implies all the physics that lead to it, so too does a fell formulated philosophical aphorism. for example, ‘reality is what it is regardless of what is believed of it’ or ‘reactions to the inevitable are a self fulfilling prophecy’ i have pre-loaded the app with ~100 of my own personal aphorisms/quotes, and had it cycle through them at the top. None of those are AI generated. They were originally documented for personal use as ‘ideas to meditate on’. I then trained a version of ‘gemini’ to operate under the definitional parameters of my philosophical framework centred around hyper self-critical intellectual honesty. Now, when you click the ‘elaborate on Nihle quote’ button, it unfolds the oragami of the idea for deeper reflection. lastly, at the bottom, you can ask it something about its recent elaboration, or, ask it anything at all if you want to just interact with the NR (Nihilistic Realism) trained Gem bot. gemini.google.com/share… Please try to make it contradict itself, or be dishonest, or otherwise break it! then let me know submitted by /u/ImportantDebateM8
Originally posted by u/ImportantDebateM8 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.