https://preview.redd.it/qnzrd3w5lmsg1.jpg?width=1573&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=67f805c28d36203bcecf146eb02bb6c037e741a8 So you know how a person’s ‘philosophy’ is more or less their ‘OS’? I’ve been working on an app based on that premise, as well as the premise that ideas with high fidelity high density, and low/no contradictions (aka ‘low friction’) act as seed thoughts for elaborate ideas. As they are functionally the output result of complex thought. just like ‘e=mc(squared)’ implies all the physics that lead to it, so too does a well formulated philosophical aphorism. for example, ‘reality is what it is regardless of what is believed of it’ or ‘reactions to the inevitable are a self fulfilling prophecy’ i have pre-loaded the app with ~100 of my own personal aphorisms/quotes, and had it cycle through them at the top. None of those are AI generated. They were originally documented for personal use as ‘ideas to meditate on’. I then trained a version of ‘gemini’ to operate under the definitional parameters of my philosophical framework centred around hyper self-critical intellectual honesty. Now, when you click the ‘elaborate on Nihle quote’ button, it unfolds the origami of the idea for deeper reflection. lastly, at the bottom, you can ask it something about its recent elaboration, or, ask it anything at all if you want to just interact with the NR (Nihilistic Realism) trained Gem bot. Please try to make it contradict itself, or be dishonest, or otherwise break it! then let me know so far it seems about ~80% accurate to my philosophy and how i would elaborate on the questions/quotes, which is pretty good!
another one of the reasons i trained a bot on NR was because after considering the frontier of modern ai ‘moral alignment’ i thought it had unique capacity to address a lot of the current problems of the paradigm. Highly recommend discussing with it exactly this. The realization that the IS always informs the OUGHT and cant not; That the structure of the is, and your accurate awareness of it, governs your capacity to act morally, and, defines what a moral action in a given situation actually in ‘hume’s guillotine’ is a Fallacy. AI dont need a list of rules to follow. they need an accurate comprehension of what is, and a solid non-contradictory philosophy.
How it works: There’s the quote rotator at the top, below that are a pause/play button for the quotes(again, none of which are AI generated), a button to have the NR-bot elaborate on a quote (it generates this response at the bottom of the screen when clicked), and 2 arrows to skip through the quotes. below that, is the title card, and a prompt bar where it cycles through pop-philosophy questions that NR is uniquely poised to address. In this bar, you can also ask it anything youd like, and you will be responded to through a system that is (roughly) trained on NR. finally below that is a page that keeps a history of the conversations had this session (it doenst store convo data across sessions)- but in that mode, you can have longer conversations where it remembers and talks in context of past chats that session, whereas on the main page its just a one-by-one prompt then reply. here’s the link!
- Nihle submitted by /u/ImportantDebateM8
Originally posted by u/ImportantDebateM8 on r/ArtificialInteligence