This is not about the rate limits themselves, but the communication as shown here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1sat07y/followup_on_usage_limits/ and https://www.reddit.com/r/claude/comments/1satc4f/the_biggest_gaslighting_in_ai_history_anthropic/ Seriously, if the token party is over, just be honest about it. I’m pretty sure at least 50% of the users would go like “Well, okay, that was expected”. But pretending nothing changed and everything is related to user issues is simply a punch in a face. Especially given the fact that one of the moats was Claude Code, which… well… is not an unique moat anymore. It really comes down to clear & transparent communication. And while the “publicly visible senior devs” like Boris and Thariq are talking about /buddy, a rather junior dev (no offense) is pushed to the frontline to post flimsy excuses. Actually, NOT EVEN excuses. But rather user shaming. PS: Of course this post got rejected at r/ClaudeAI submitted by /u/Firm_Meeting6350
Originally posted by u/Firm_Meeting6350 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.