Right from the start of openclaw (or openslop, really), it was clear that this ‘tool’ was just a run-of-the-mill AI model cobbled together with a bit of a patchwork job and a huge number of pre-made libraries. The creator didn’t do anything you couldn’t have done yourselves – he just wrote a few prompts and that was it. Openslop is only so popular thanks to guerrilla marketing and friends who wrote a few articles about how brilliant openslop is. A huge number of bugs, more than open-source frameworks and engines that are far more complex than openslop. A host of critical vulnerabilities and a massive mess in the repository. Typical of a tool written entirely by AI – zero optimisation. Openslop burns through tokens and context like there’s no tomorrow, often on unnecessary or repetitive tasks and things. If you don’t know how to configure or set anything up, the AI will still help you set up the essentials, and you’ll waste a good 50% less context than what OpenSLOP provides as a ready-made solution. Openslop would be a good tool, but it’s a rubbish heap that needs to be scrapped and rebuilt from scratch; they shouldn’t be trying to resuscitate a corpse at this stage. Seriously, if you want a higher limit, use mature tools that are at least partly written by developers, rather than Claw AI Slop, which is 100% AI-written. A lot of the positive comments here about this slop are written by bots too; I know because I’ve had a look at a few of them, and I was able to ask one questions and got answers as if I were writing to an AI. submitted by /u/CacheConqueror
Originally posted by u/CacheConqueror on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.