https://preview.redd.it/vfmxgtb46vxg1.png?width=1915&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b7cedec52f05eefaf604699dca8246a259cf713 So my last post blew up, turns out a lot of people hit the same Claude blind-spots problem. Going deeper this time. Quick recap. Been on the 20x Claude plan running Opus 4.6 / 4.7 exclusively for a while. Last week I tried Codex 5.5 and was shocked by how much Opus had been missing. Pairing them felt like the piece I’d been waiting for. A week later I’m way past two agents. Current setup, all in tmux: 3x Codex CLI, each on a separate ChatGPT Plus account so reset windows don’t collide Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Kimi K2.6 + DeepSeek V4 Pro, both via OpenCode Go (way cheaper than API keys, and 3x limits on Kimi) Built a /work command in Claude that handles four shapes: plan, implement, major bug, minor bug. For each one it builds a context pack, sends it to 3 reviewers in parallel, waits for consensus. The thing that actually matters here is lineage diversity . Reviewers are picked as 1 Codex + 1 Gemini + 1 OpenCode. Same-family models share blind spots, three Codex sessions reviewing the same code is mostly an echo chamber. Need all three lineages to agree before the gate opens. If they don’t, Claude revises and runs it again. Before any merge, Claude fills out a 4 question checklist (coding principles, architecture drift, tests pass, reviewer consensus) and I pick merge / fix first / override with reason. Catches a lot of “I think it’s done” moments. Cost so far is basically $0 on top of the subscriptions I already had. The thing I keep noticing: Opus by itself is great until it isn’t, and the failures are silent. Code looks reasonable, tests pass, but there’s a subtle bug or design drift that only shows up later. Having a different model family read the same code fresh catches a startling amount of it. Happy to share the /work prompt and orchestrator if anyone wants to make it their own, let me know. submitted by /u/99xAgency
Originally posted by u/99xAgency on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.