Since the advent of the agentic revolution, I have spent most of my time reviewing code rather than writing it. The code I review is either pushed by teammates or generated by agentic tools such as Claude Code. If the code is well structured, predictable, with good semantics, layers, architecture, etc., it’s easier for our human brains to review. Besides, it helps the agent to understand the code more easily without surprises. It’s very common that Claude’s code will generate code that doesn’t follow the SOLID principles, it will not use dependency injection, it won’t be DRY, etc. So the human (I) needs to step in to make sure the AI-generated code follows the best standards. What is your opinion about that view? Is that what separates a junior from a more experienced engineer while vibe coding? submitted by /u/_ILikePancakes
Originally posted by u/_ILikePancakes on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.