As many of you might be aware, the ARC-AGI-3 competition has just started … (In case you’re not familiar: it’s a human/AI benchmark designed to see what AI still struggles with, that humans solve with ease - basically trying to push AI research to focus on new ideas that make AI think more human-like, assuming that that’s what is required to solve such tasks, you could read more in their docs…) Seeing as the benchmark has so far only been solved at 0.68% , I was wondering what a real solution would look like: If a system has to explore and collect data, infer rules and patterns, decide which are useful, and then establish a set of rules and apply them, it seems that it such a system/algorithm would do essentially what a successful scientist would do. Apart from it being quite unrealistic in very near future, I do think that such a model (that achieves ~100% on arc-3), if open sourced (which is a condition to win the competition), would hold great potential for dangerous application, such as the military ( engineering weapons ), cybersecurity , manipulation, etc… Do you agree? How do supposed an arc-3 solution (~100%) could be a threat, in the purely hypothetical scenario that were to get one this year? https://preview.redd.it/qtelq8ciqjyg1.png?width=1842&format=png&auto=webp&s=0cdb46a092f797e2ee7fa432c68e3d3dd4b0e5e4 submitted by /u/Specific_Bad8641
Originally posted by u/Specific_Bad8641 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.