That’s really just my personal opinion, but I wonder how you guys see it… my month-long workflow was to use Opus for planning and implementation, Codex for review. Codex simply felt like (as another redditor wrote) “Beep beep, here’s your code” - and it was slow. yesterday I got close to my weekly limits, so I kept Opus for planning but switched to Codex (in Codex CLI, not opencode) for implementation (2nd codex + Copilot + Coderabbit for review). And it actually feels faster - even faster when compared with Opus + parallel subagents. And the quality (and that’s really just a feeling based on the review findings - but of course we can’t compare different plans and implementations etc.) seems to be at least as good as with Opus’ implementation. What’s your take on that? submitted by /u/Firm_Meeting6350
Originally posted by u/Firm_Meeting6350 on r/ClaudeCode