I am coding an app for some internal tracking and so far it is looking great. my work flow has been the following. create prompt in claude.ai paste prompt into vscode claude extension all files in git repository, all branches verified in dev before merging to main deploy to production, verify again The question I have is that I run ALL prompts through claud.ai even small changes. For example, a table with check boxes in it had the top heading bar set to transparent. after identifying the problem i could have easily fixed it by going into vs code claude extension and telling it the top bar was in transparent and ask it fix it. instead i generated a pretty lengthy prompt in claude chat (all under a project) that updates documentation performs the git updates, ect. This is what a typical prompt looks like even for minor changes: Please read PLAN.md and ISSUES.md before starting. The Matrix has a visual artifact where the sticky header row has a transparent or semi-transparent background. When scrolling vertically the role rows and their checkboxes show through behind the column header text making it unreadable. Fix the header background so it is fully opaque and covers the scrolling content beneath it. DIAGNOSIS: <prompt> FIX: <prompt> DOCUMENTATION UPDATES: Add the next sequential issue number to ISSUES.md as resolved with title Am I burning too many tokens this way or is the additional checks and balances worth the effort? submitted by /u/dabuggin1
Originally posted by u/dabuggin1 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.