I’m building a tool for myself because reviewing AI-generated PRs is starting to feel weirdly hard. When an AI coding agent makes changes, I don’t just want a generic summary. I want evidence that helps me quickly answer: “Can I trust this change, and where should I slow down?” So I’m trying to figure out what a useful review brief should actually include. If you were in my shoes — using AI agents to write code and then needing to review their PRs — what would you want to see in the first 60 seconds? What would help you quickly understand: What actually changed? I’m not trying to build a giant dashboard. I’m trying to make the first minute of review less stressful and more useful. If you reviewed an AI-generated PR, what evidence would make you feel more confident? Why did the agent make those changes? Did it stay within scope? Which files are risky vs. routine? What tests were run? What assumptions did the agent make? What should I personally double-check before merging? I’m not trying to build a giant dashboard. I’m trying to make the first minute of review less stressful and more useful. If you reviewed an AI-generated PR, what evidence would make you feel more confident? submitted by /u/Few-Ad-1358
Originally posted by u/Few-Ad-1358 on r/ClaudeCode