https://preview.redd.it/0ralmhfo152h1.png?width=1860&format=png&auto=webp&s=41b55a27e3f4aab4784b55591353071b33dd4f74 It’s irresponsible to compare industrial revolution with the AI revolution. The Industrial Revolution replaced human muscle. AI is replacing human competence. That is not the same thing. A power loom didn’t eliminate humans from the textile industry. It increased output, lowered prices, increased the demand, and created giant downstream labor markets around factories, railroads, logistics, steel, maintenance, management, etc. The machine still needed millions of humans. AI is fundamentally different because software scales almost infinitely while requiring very few people to operate. If an automated loom replaced 10 weavers, you still needed mechanics, operators, supervisors, transport workers, miners, factory builders and an expanding industrial workforce behind it. If AI replaces 10 analysts, writers, designers, support staff or coders, the replacement ratio may be 10:1, 50:1 or eventually 1000:1. People say: “New jobs will appear.” Sure. But that’s not the real question. The real question is: Will the new economy require mass human labor at all? History suggests yes because history only contains tools that amplified humans. AI may be the first tool that economically competes with human cognition itself. That is historically unprecedented. And another thing people ignore is speed. The Industrial Revolution unfolded across generations. Society had time to adapt. Entire populations were not globally competing with a better blacksmith every six months. AI capabilities jump materially year to year, sometimes month to month. The transition shock alone could destabilize entire sectors before society has time to reorganize around new ones. The question is not that “machines are taking jobs” in the old sense. It’s that automation is climbing the economic ladder humans always escaped to. submitted by /u/Scared_Jump486
Originally posted by u/Scared_Jump486 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.