A while ago, I used to write short posts about art online. I didn’t think about art in a very academic way. I just felt that art shouldn’t only belong to rich people, museums, or people with professional training. Sometimes a song, a painting, or even a simple object in daily life can comfort someone, especially when life feels difficult. Now AI can generate images so fast, and some of them really do look beautiful. But this makes me a bit confused. If everyone can make beautiful images with AI, then maybe beauty itself is not enough anymore. Maybe the more important question becomes: what is the person trying to say? Did they have a real feeling behind it? Did they make a real choice? Or did they just type a prompt and pick the most impressive result? I don’t think AI will destroy art. But I do think it may make us rethink what counts as art. Maybe there will be different levels of AI art in the future. Some will just be decoration. Some will be made for attention. Some may still carry real human experience, even if AI helped make it. I’m still not sure where the line is. Can AI art still feel real to you if the human behind it has a strong idea? Or does the use of AI already make it feel less valuable? submitted by /u/biliby8172
Originally posted by u/biliby8172 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.