“…That x connects to z and ah, actually z has access to the data it needs so it’s fine to add y. Good.” I feel like the latest models/CC have some sort of hardcoded imperative to finish off implementation proposals with a ‘tradeoffs/caveats/verification’ section, which gets weird as hell - sometimes everything makes sense and the task is pretty clear cut with no obvious tradeoffs or caveats, so the model just outputs a chunky section of comments like the one above sort of reasoning about potential problems and finding them to not actually be issues. Not a huge problem but I do want to bring it up because it’s truly confusing and unnecessary noise, and kind of dumb behavior for models that are supposed to be on the edge of LLM intelligence. submitted by /u/endgamer42
Originally posted by u/endgamer42 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.