Honestly this is something I’ve been thinking about for a while but couldn’t fully articulate until recently. I’ve been using Claude and ChatGPT pretty heavily for months and just… assumed that made me competent. Like usage skill, right? Then I came across AISA and tried it mostly out of curiosity. It’s an AI assessment but instead of the usual multiple choice stuff, it’s conversational, which immediately felt different. What it flagged for me was kind of humbling. I was doing well on the workflow and speed side but genuinely weak at catching flawed or misleading AI outputs. And looking back, that tracks. I’ve been optimizing for getting things done fast, not for questioning whether the output was actually right. It made me think about how loosely we throw around ““AI skills.”” Like what does that even mean? Prompting? Reasoning? Knowing when NOT to trust the output? Curious if anyone else here has thought about where the line actually is between being a heavy AI user and being genuinely proficient. submitted by /u/vinewb
Originally posted by u/vinewb on r/ArtificialInteligence