I have been trying to make my coding-agent workflow less vibes-based after a run finishes. The rough idea: when Claude Code says “done,” I want a small receipt that makes the run reviewable later, not just a transcript. Things like: files touched / commands run tools used and whether they were read/write/exec/network approvals or prompts that changed the run tests/checks attempted and their status whether any state was changed outside the repo enough IDs to join back to logs or traces I am exploring this in Armorer as a local ops/control-plane layer around agents, but I am mostly trying to sanity-check the shape with people who actually use Claude Code daily. For Claude Code users: what evidence do you wish you had after a long run? What would make you trust, resume, or debug a run faster? Related design thread if useful: https://github.com/ArmorerLabs/Armorer/discussions/45 submitted by /u/Conscious_Chapter_93
Originally posted by u/Conscious_Chapter_93 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.