A lot of agent hype is about autonomy. But this week’s AI governance discussion makes me think the real problem is not capability. It’s scope. An agent that only observes is very different from an agent that sends emails, updates databases, approves refunds, or touches customer data. Treating all agents the same seems risky. Maybe the future is not “fully autonomous agents.” Maybe it is agents with different levels of permission based on the risk of the action. Would you trust an AI agent more if its autonomy increased gradually instead of being fully open from day one? submitted by /u/Alpertayfur
Originally posted by u/Alpertayfur on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.
