Disclosure: I built and maintain this. It is free, MIT-licensed, and there are no paid tiers or referral links. SuperGoal is a portable agent skill for Claude Code, Codex, and similar coding CLIs. The goal is simple: one objective goes in, but the agent should not call the work done until it has grounded the task, made the smallest correct change, and verified against the project’s real tests/spec instead of a generated checklist. The failure mode I wanted to reduce is familiar: an agent edits in the wrong checkout, skips the real browser flow, or optimizes to a fake verifier. Recent v0.3.3 changes:
- coding/debug runs resolve source/base and target/integration branches before file mutation
- non-trivial runs use a branch-scoped worktree instead of mutating the original checkout
- browser UI changes require real Playwright evidence and a QA gate
- the full shell contract suite is part of the repo It also has modes for DEBUG, LEGACY, SPEC, QA-only, review-only, architecture survey, teaching, codebase onboarding, and harness evaluation. GitHub: https://github.com/cskwork/supergoal-skill Landing page: https://cskwork.github.io/supergoal-skill/ Release: https://github.com/cskwork/supergoal-skill/releases/tag/v0.3.3 I am looking for feedback from people using Claude Code/Codex-style agents on real repos: what verification gates have actually prevented bad agent changes for you? submitted by /u/International_Hawk30
Originally posted by u/International_Hawk30 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.