I find that Gemini is too matter-of-fact in it’s conclusions (over-confident in conclusions that are slightly off to the point of being misleading and, on occasion, dangerous) and comes up with plausible but fanciful theories (context: medical research and analysis) but ChatGPT seems to be very nuanced and fine-tuned in its intelligence and is the better product. Shame that ChatGPTs context window is not as great as Gemini’s. Google is really good for NotebookLM though for knowledge retrieval, which I use for medical data storage and retrival. Is this the consensus? submitted by /u/Sovereign108
Originally posted by u/Sovereign108 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.
