I think Chatbots are great tools and they should be used. I think whatever the chatbots produce will be proportional to the quality of the prompts used to produce. Yes they can produce a lot of garbage called “ai garbage” but at the same time the text produced by that chatbot can be a great text coming from a great prompt. The risk is real, a lot of material being produced out there is garbage and AI can produce large amounts of garbage, but there will be gems out there. Even more, what I was trying to do was not produce stuff from chat bots, I were trying to use the chat bots to turn the stuff I PRODUCED, easier to understand. I produced those with effort and I were simply dismissed as “AI”. Disregarding everything simply because “sounds like ai” have problems: -there is margin of error, and probably high quality text that are highly unusual will be more likely to be rated as AI. -There could be a very good interesting and rare prompt behind that text that you are also disregarding completely as AI. Great examples of what I am talking about can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/ Not every image is good and the good ones are frequently asked on what prompt was used there. Not only the result is praised they are also curious and praising the prompts themselves. submitted by /u/TheWordsAreVanishing
Originally posted by u/TheWordsAreVanishing on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.