AI skills are increasingly listed on résumés, but the claim is usually impossible to examine. I built an early local-first system that measures a user’s Claude Code and Codex activity and creates a signed public profile without publishing prompts, responses, source code, or local file paths. The system is intentionally conservative: • token volume is not presented as intelligence or expertise • identity and outcomes remain unverified until separately confirmed • users preview the complete public payload • users host their own signed snapshot • verification happens in the visitor’s browser Example: https://ledger.imagineqira.com/#/u/bryan Technical-alpha onboarding: https://ledger.imagineqira.com/#/join Open-source collector: https://github.com/TheArtOfSound/TOKENS I’m looking for early technical users and criticism. Is the core premise useful, or does AI activity remain too ambiguous to support professional identity even when paired with work evidence? submitted by /u/OGMYT
Originally posted by u/OGMYT on r/ArtificialInteligence