An alternative, rather than a superior to 4.8 (task dependent), inferior to Fable in nearly every way. The biggest regression is how difficult it is to read and understand its output. Communication is mired in technical detail and citations of internal documents I need to look up to make sense of. Adding “humanize output” to prompts is now a necessity. Similar to the previous point, it often fails to surface important issues, because it’s hyper fixated on minor details - adversarial review is a must for both plans and output. Constant “You were right and I was wrong”. I’m not sure it this is good or bad yet. Either the model admits mistakes more or makes more mistakes. Probably both. The best responsibility delegation is IMO: Fable for task analysis and ticket spec writing Opus 5 for drudgery and implementation 5.6 Sol for adversarial review submitted by /u/WonderfulEagle7096
Originally posted by u/WonderfulEagle7096 on r/ClaudeCode
