I’m starting to track my AI video process as three separate stretches: brief to rough draft, rough draft to approved direction, and approval to final delivery. Timing only the generation step has been kinda misleading. The first stretch is where AI has actually made things faster. I can put together a rough sequence much quicker than before. The second stretch is where it gets sticky. The character drifts slightly between shots. The product color drifts. The voiceover lands between cuts. Every fix means replacing clips and trying to keep the whole thing visually connected. Whatever I saved in the first stretch gets eaten here. The third stretch, audio tweaks, pacing adjustments, export settings has nothing to do with AI generation. It just needs to happen, and it takes however long it takes. I work with Framia, so I’m using it as the workspace to test this process, keeping the script, references, storyboard and attempts together while I work. My early impression is that the first stretch improves much more than the other two, but I need several projects before treating that as a real result. Time-to-first-draft is useful, but if you only measure the fun part, you’re lying to yourself about the ROI. Which of these stretches are people actually tracking?curious to hear. submitted by /u/abhayvaidyaonreddit
Originally posted by u/abhayvaidyaonreddit on r/ArtificialInteligence