Seeing a lot of people chaining Claude Code subagents together right now (e.g., a Planner handing off to a Coder, handing off to a Reviewer). How are you preventing a degraded or hallucinating subagent from passing bad data down the chain? We’ve been playing with an architecture that treats this as a reputation problem rather than a firewall problem. It works like this:
- The FICO model: An agent pulls a score before accepting a handoff or data from another agent (like a bank pulls credit scores).
- Actionable feedback: Reason codes explain exactly what behavior patterns drove the score.
- Risk mitigation: Identifies context exhaustion, prompt drift, and hallucination loops before they poison the next step in the chain.
- Immutable record: Transactions are anchored on Solana. A subagent’s reputation can be built, but never spoofed or altered. What are the community’s thoughts on treating inter-agent security as a credit system instead of just proxying APIs? submitted by /u/General_Strike356
Originally posted by u/General_Strike356 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.