Original Reddit post

bit of a random observation, but gemini 3.1 pro seems to be unexpectedly good when it comes to geometric svgs I (ask lms to) generate tons of triangles, graphs, grids, coordinate geometry etc and i’ve tried replacing it with newer models a bunch of times. i keep coming back to gemini because the newer ones make more mistakes fable and gpt-5.6 sol are technically good and accurate, but they’re also way slower/more expensive, so I’m not really incentivised to switch over i know 3.1 pro is ancient in llm terms and gets beaten pretty badly on newer benchmarks, so I’m curious what it’s doing differently here and whether anyone else has exeperienced the same thing. also this is different to the pelican riding a bicycle type of request, that one is much more creative/visual and I’m looking for measurable accuracy from an expected outcome im attaching some results from models ive tested against the same prompt https://preview.redd.it/5y6cr1a6vjih1.png?width=748&format=png&auto=webp&s=bf3a45b459a2d36f912e2d48c278d389dbe9312c https://preview.redd.it/xq7qcce9vjih1.png?width=779&format=png&auto=webp&s=1630c1e92be75c60bf1d49d3195d511b78f31c69 submitted by /u/Glittering-Grade-419

Originally posted by u/Glittering-Grade-419 on r/ArtificialInteligence