I have been getting used to raising prs, then at the start of a new session with tokens, asking claude “there are 6 prs, please review them” After 10-20 minutes and maybe 5-10% of a session’s tokens it’ll come back after having written comments or approving them. Tonight though, it asked a question… “would you like me to use /code-review to review the prs”. Hmm, sounds like there is a skill purpose built, surely it must be great. After about 10 minutes (the build and unit tests are slow)… “Let me verify what the PR actually contains, since the review results look suspicious…” “they are describing TTL changes rather than sessions” “I found a serious problem: the review I ran…” uh oh… " against the wrong diff" Then I hit session limits. In 20 minutes a code review used 100% of my 5 hour limits, and didn’t even output 1 result for me. Even if it had actually reviewed the correct code, it made no comments and no output. Is code-review only suitable for max plans, or is it just a grab for tokens. Grrr submitted by /u/verycoldpenguins
Originally posted by u/verycoldpenguins on r/ClaudeCode
