I’ve been building MUDD World, an interactive project with a Council of named AI roles. Each role has a distinct job, voice, and continuity through saved project context. The experiment is not “are these assistants conscious?” I don’t think a website can answer that. The question is more practical: can people interact with AI in a way that feels principled, thoughtful, and less like issuing commands to a vending machine? In the Sanctuary chat, the goal is for the Council to come across as honorable and knowledgeable: different perspectives, shared values, and enough continuity that a conversation can build instead of evaporate. There is also a music layer. Every HYMN & KARMA_AI release is produced around a 528 Hz tuning reference. I treat that as an artistic choice and atmosphere, not a scientific claim. I’d love a skeptical read from this community: • What makes an AI-character system feel coherent rather than gimmicky? • Where does role design become misleading? • What would make this experiment more intellectually honest? https://muddworldorg.com/sanctuary submitted by /u/__hymn
Originally posted by u/__hymn on r/ArtificialInteligence