Our team merged 214 PRs last month and I properly read maybe 12 of them. The rest got a skim of the summary, a glance at the tests, approve. Nobody planned this, review capacity just stopped scaling with output and everyone quietly adjusted. The tooling made it worse in a weird way. coderabbit catches enough real bugs that trusting it feels rational, but that trust is exactly what’s letting us read less every month. We’re not deciding to stop reviewing, we’re eroding into it So I keep wondering where this actually lands. Do we end up reviewing only auth and money paths? Only what the bots escalate? Nothing? People said the same about hand checking assembly once compilers got good, and they were right to stop Where does your team honestly draw the line today, and is it moving? submitted by /u/Upset-Day9099
Originally posted by u/Upset-Day9099 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.