I ask this in the Claude sub instead of ChatGPT sub since I don’t want a bunch of people agreeing, but want actual discussion from users of Claude. I am personally using both Sol 5.6 and Opus 5 right now to do deep market research, assigning one model to be a bear and another a bull and have them debate on any given topic. I have noticed two things. First, while both make some mistakes in their claims, it seems Opus makes far more factual errors, which end up being subsequently corrected by Sol. Sol does make some too, but significantly fewer. Second, Opus always seems to come across as combative. It isn’t always a bad thing, since pressure testing is what I want, but at the same time it will often come up with disputes which end up being insignificant (or flat out factually incorrect), just for the sake of arguing. Am I crazy or is this something else people experience? submitted by /u/Wooden_Boss_3403
Originally posted by u/Wooden_Boss_3403 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.