Quick context: we’re not really an “AI company” in the pure sense , we’re 100% leveraged on AI, but the curriculum itself was designed over two dedicated years directly with government school teachers, before any generation engine touched it. The actual pipeline: AI content generation engine drafts questions/worksheets → every single question is hand-curated and teacher-vetted → templates themselves were built by curriculum developers, not engineers. Even TTS output and UI copy goes through the same vetting layer. We still added a report button in-product, because humans reviewing at scale still miss things occasionally ,wanted a fast correction loop instead of pretending the system is perfect. Curious how this community thinks about “AI-leveraged but human-gated” as a model for high-stakes content generation (kids’ education being about as high-stakes as it gets) , is full automation ever the right goal here, or should human-in-the-loop stay permanent for this category? submitted by /u/Sir_Dead_Eye_01
Originally posted by u/Sir_Dead_Eye_01 on r/ArtificialInteligence