Genuinely curious how other teams are dealing with this. I’m seeing more and more PRs where a big part of the code is AI-generated. I don’t have a problem with that itself, but the issue is when the developer hasn’t properly gone through it or verified that it actually makes sense. Then the reviewer ends up spending a lot of time figuring out whether the code is actually correct. Are you guys changing your review process because of this? Smaller PRs, more tests, asking developers to explain their changes, or something else? Would be interesting to hear how other teams are handling it. submitted by /u/Calm_Attention_4155
Originally posted by u/Calm_Attention_4155 on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.