Hey all, Our company recently start building LangGraph workflows for web feature & BAU development. The goal is to have every dev onboard to use the predefined LangGraph workflows to complete dev tasks. Here are my findings after doing some research:
- LangGraph workflow is mainly for customer facing LLM features, or as a build pipeline for BAU / Maintenance level of work.
- Devs using Claude Code / Codex with good amount of harness for the project such as static analysis, rules and guides, skills for streamline tasks are still seem to be the dominant approach. My question is: LangGraph workflow can orchestrate the workflow in a more defined way, comparing to using a skill or skills to defined this steps in indeterministic way. What’s the pros and cons to it? If it’s good to have predefined steps for the build workflow, why LangGraph workflow for local development isn’t mainstream yet? Is it true that it’s due to LangGraph workflow is too rigid and not fit for purpose for feature development? Thanks all! submitted by /u/colafroth
Originally posted by u/colafroth on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.
