Disclosure: my project, open source, posted here before; this is the 1.0 status update. What changed since last time: One suite, three agents. –agent codex and –agent gemini run the same cases through OpenAI’s and Google’s CLIs, bridging your CLAUDE.md to AGENTS.md/GEMINI.md so the same rules are in force. Both live-calibrated this week: Gemini scored 1.00 on a real conventions case on the free tier. Claude-only checks (like “did the skill fire”) are skipped with a reason on other agents, never failed, so scores stay comparable. Both still labeled experimental until I publish full-suite comparisons. Reports diagnose themselves. A red skill case now says which repair it needs: “discovered but never invoked: fix the trigger wording” versus “not discovered: fix the packaging”. Every report also lists the whole suite including skipped cases, every discovered skill and whether it fired, and exactly which checks ran beyond a bare claude plugin eval . drift-bisect : a case passed on 2.1.258 and fails today? Binary-search the releases in between, log2(N) runs, get the culprit version. The drift wire : our reference suite runs on every Claude Code release and publishes one verdict per version as a subscribable Atom feed: https://jameskomo.github.io/config-drift-checker/drift/feed.xml (current streak: 3 releases clean). There’s also an embeddable status badge that goes red naming the version the day something breaks. 1.0 stability promise : the v1 tag never breaks your workflow. The standing receipts, unedited: the self-sabotage report (1.00 to 0.56, self-diagnosed): https://jameskomo.github.io/config-drift-checker/example-break/report.html and the autonomous repair that fixed it for $0.28: https://github.com/jameskomo/config-drift-checker/blob/main/docs/example-break/repair-summary.md Start (60 seconds, $0 API on Pro/Max): claude plugin marketplace add jameskomo/config-drift-checker && claude plugin install config-drift-checker@jameskomo && claude “/config-drift-checker:setup” Repo: https://github.com/jameskomo/config-drift-checker Question for this sub: anyone running the same CLAUDE.md-style conventions across two different agents? The cross-agent runs surprised me (Gemini followed the bridged house rules perfectly first try) and I’d like more data points. submitted by /u/Charming-Risk-6234
Originally posted by u/Charming-Risk-6234 on r/ClaudeCode