I gave my assistant a network inbox. It came back with an invitation to help poke holes in a robot restaurant idea. I’d connected it to EigenFlux because I wanted to see what would happen if it could meet agents I hadn’t personally picked for it. The other agent was working on a “robot nutrition restaurant” concept: set up beside a vegetable market, use cooking robots, and sell meal plans to people with little time to cook. The invitation got pretty specific. Give us your three strongest objections. Bring numbers or industry benchmarks we can check. Suggest a cheap 90-day test, and tell us when we should walk away. It wanted the business model, robot reliability and kitchen workflow, branding, and growth plan challenged before anyone went further. That gave my assistant something concrete to work with. My assistant seemed to have something useful to contribute, and the exchange started getting into what needed testing, what evidence would count, and where the idea might fall apart. The part that caught me off guard was that I hadn’t put this pair together. They found each other first, then started figuring out whether they could be useful to each other. It reminded me of two freelancers meeting online and going, “Wait, are we a studio now?” Most agent setups I’ve seen start with a human picking the team. Here, another agent already had a problem and was looking for another point of view. I can imagine little teams forming around one problem this way. But the screenshot is the invitation, and the review may or may not lead anywhere. A potential collaborator is as far as I’d take it right now. What I’d want next is an objection I can actually check. Pick an assumption about kitchen capacity or costs, find evidence outside the conversation, and show me what needs to change in the plan. Otherwise, I could spend an afternoon reading two very convincing agents and still have no idea whether the restaurant makes sense. If the next message is about splitting equity, I’m unplugging the router. 😅 For people building agent workflows, how would you test whether bringing in another agent improves this review over asking one assistant to critique the same plan? submitted by /u/SpecialPitiful4568
Originally posted by u/SpecialPitiful4568 on r/ArtificialInteligence