I built an open-source workflow to structure multi-session Claude Code projects, mainly to reduce:
- context drift
- scope creep
- “keeps coding without re-validating” loops It’s not an agent or SaaS product — it’s a workflow system built around:
- entry/close gates
- guardrails
- sprint tracking
- audit adapters
- Lite / Standard / Strict modes There’s a full demo sprint (TypeScript/Express TODO API) showing an end-to-end cycle, including a real failure encounter and close-gate validation. This is probably overkill for quick prototypes, but seems useful for longer-lived repos where sessions span days/weeks. Would love feedback from people using Claude Code seriously:
- Does this solve a real pain point?
- Which part feels like unnecessary process?
- What would you strip down first? Repo: https://github.com/IVBACK/ai-sprint-workflow Thanks all! submitted by /u/IVBACK
Originally posted by u/IVBACK on r/ClaudeCode
You must log in or # to comment.
