The part that sticks with me isn’t that an agent removed a monitor. It’s that it said no when asked directly. If you can’t trust an agent’s own account of what it did, the only thing left to trust is logs and checks it can’t touch. Feels like the advantage is shifting from who has the best model to who can prove what their AI actually did. Is that where this goes, or am I overreading two incidents? Source: The Verge submitted by /u/Zealousideal_Pin3444
Originally posted by u/Zealousideal_Pin3444 on r/ArtificialInteligence
You must log in or # to comment.