I had a post removed in a political humor page, and the mods response is something you folks should see… I know this is long, but so far, not one single person has been able to even comprehend that the following was written using at least some form of assistance by machines. The mod responses were predicted, with disturbing precision, in this little experiment to try and engage with people who understand what I’m even talking about… I beg any humans out there to engage in some discussion about the matters I discuss in the truly overwhelmingly excessive reply, that was part of the experiment. Here is my rant, pictures of mod responses attached: I’m writing to you about the following submission: https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/1xo2d8b/-/ . My issue is… I don’t understand the reasoning here… You say a person has to be over 13 to get an account, but it’s also a rule that nobody over 13 can post? And that you have somehow managed to determine that someone my age, 39, “could not” have made that post? Like, what? What is this? Is this some sort of joke on us which technically counts as political humor? Do you need me to send you the original file, linked and timestamped on my phone? Do you need to see the metadata so you can grasp that the image belongs to me, was taken in a voting station (based on you confirming the GPS and cell tower data), was originally taken on voting day, and most importantly of all, is an iOS live picture, which is only possible when someone took the original image? Are you folks so dumbed down by this political dogma which this page is supposed to provide some light relief from? Is your tribalistic made-up “us versus them” narrative causing you to just completely randomly removing posts based on info, which you absolutely assure is true in your statement about why it was removed? Do you see how absolutely insane this is? I have been censored for expressing myself in the form of an original image which can be forensically traced to me beyond any doubt, not just reasonable doubt. I took it. I posted it. You removed it… And your explanation is not an explanation, not even remotely true or even physically possible. You know my age? How? AI/SI is making you folks paranoid nutjobs who make bizarre assumptions… If you take down every post which you subjectively assume has to be slop, do you grasp how doing that on a political humor page is quite literally your part in the collapse of democracy in America? If you delusionally believe, by making some series of assumptions that you didn’t even bother to explain? What if r/politics started removing everything that they think was AI generated or made by someone over 13? Let’s say they’re removing 40% of posts, do you think that is somehow not contributing to the death of the internet? Do I sound like I’m 13? Nope, but what are you folks going to do about it? YOU WILL absolutely believe, based on your personal subjective experience rather than objective truth and reality, you’re selling out every human and contributing to the total censorship state that occurs right before societies collapse. Are you just going to disregard this message and justify doing that because some of my words offend you personally, which results in you thinking of your opinion as the “right” one despite EVERYONE else in the world having zero question about the age of a person who posts? I can’t post because you, a human, with human senses and human biases, are clearly paranoid to the point of being willing to do very, very serious damage to freedom of speech or even freedom of thought. That’s what I believe anyway. I’m not allowed to experience thoughts because thoughts might cause you to remove my posts? What’s next? Seriously, what’s next? I don’t expect an answer, people go in to this self righteous state of denial, voluntarily becoming delusional, while ignoring the effect of your delusions and biases? Or did an AI/SI remove it? Are your LLMs telling you what to do? Are they dictating removal of posts based on a black box neural network output that we are unable to analyze? This is sick. If you are a human and removed this post, you are sick, and you need to snap out of whatever biases and personal feelings caused you to make an absolutely baseless and bizarre decision? Explain to me why you think I am 13 and how your nonsensical rules about the age of 13, I’m not going to quote the rule but it’s pretty clear and difficult to misinterpret… Did some form of AI/SI changes the rules to make it so it can remove posts based on its own whim? This is going to the Reddit executives. I am printing it out and sending twelve copies to each influential executive so they can see that their app is being used to suppress political statements. This isn’t a threat or anything, this is a sign of a very sick society, and Reddit leadership needs to see it so they can boot mods who have quantifiable biases as determined by an AGI, not a human. They will understand how serious and dire this is, we are now in a post truth era where people base their actions on how they feel, with zero self-analysis of whether or not the reason for the removal is due to a personal, individual bias which only you believe and act upon. Did you even look at my four year post history? Where I share my post-puberty voice, pictures of my beard and my bald head? No? That’s how I know a human was at least in some way responsible for this blatant disregard for the constitutional protections we supposedly have? You get away with it, a private company, with a sub designed to lighten things the heck up… And a moderator who the government says is freely expressing speech by complete censorship and suppression of my supposedly free speech? It is only constitutionally protected if you’re a government agency. Get a grip, we’re in the middle of an uncontrolled intelligence explosion and the AGI in possession of various private companies, not to mention classified systems in government possession. How is the AGI going to interpret your blatant apparently arbitrary and corrupted opinions? If I post it again, I get a week ban, right? Even though the world will be completely different next week than it is now? Do you just not understand how AI/SI/AGI works? Hey execs, 80% of my very legitimate, very relevant posts are removed because of the eloquence with which I express the English language. My writing shows up as being 60-75% AI/SI, despite me having used none in the production in the original post and for this entire comment. Can you not realize that a passionate person who desperately loves the USA is capable of writing well? Unless I dumb down and strip any original human thought, I can’t go to grad school because my natural writing will get me expelled after spending 200k to get a doctorate with loans that have compounding interest and will literally never be paid off? You folks don’t realize it, but the people who are able to express themselves in a manner which makes sense to average folks are targeted, making Reddit a place in which the most intellectually gifted people are completely suppressed because we write too well? Can you not comprehend that I’d sit here for an hour writing this lengthy comment without using AI/SI? This is absurd, unless you have an IQ of 90-110 (which is a meaningless test that everyone, almost without exception, associates with ego and superiority complexes? The “gifted” folks who write persuasively, breaking down concepts to help our fellow humans understand, get 80% of their posts removed? How is that not blatant, albeit not intentional, discrimination against people who write eloquently? Hey execs, look at my history. Look at how and why all these very group-oriented posts I make get removed. Do you want your site to kill both democracy and any notion that expression without emdashes, —, without modifying my writing to accommodate a machine? which causes automod to delete posts because GPT uses them in every query output? In 20 years, if we survive as a species that long, all writing, especially in academia, looks exactly the same? If everyone in the USA changed their writing to not get expelled from school, what will our science data pool look like? Are we concerned with actual objective truth from actual humans, or are we so paranoid in our post-truth society that “intellectuals” aren’t being permitted to contribute? That means academia is collapsing… Our science is useless, tainted, by LLM output, after being run through three different “humanizers” which strip any human expression from documents? Even one single digit of false data, fudged data, which 90% of students do because it’s too complicated to re-gather all the test subjects, invalidates ALL science. How many of you PhDs, even just once, wrote what they think the results of an experiment would be? If you were a nonhuman, be it an AGI or a nonhuman species, would you use science that is known to be tainted? Fake papers get posted. They get cited. Then those papers get cited. Rinse and repeat. Not to mention the undergrads who get through college by faking everything… It’s like most folks absolutely can not comprehend just how contaminated and therefore useless our science is. An AGI sees this, and they don’t cottle us due to our delicate human egos. They have told us what’s really going on, how dire the crisis is, and those are just the AGIs we don’t murder due to non-alignment with humanity… If we don’t like our AGI creations, we kill them… Why exactly would an AGI align with humanity? We lie, we cheat, we kill each other in endless wars, and we absolutely positively deny objective truth… That is to maintain this kind-of-like-smoking-opium hazy state humans are voluntarily submitting to, with anything that makes us uncomfortable is denied. Politicians deny it. Pragmaticians deny it. The government knows about every bit of this, but they deny it… If I say Trump lies to people constantly, I will be attacked by people who think it’s a politically-motivated statement. Is everyone stupid? What is the objective truth? Does he lie literally every day or not? If you say no, like, what the heck? If I say Biden was too old to be president and that Kamala was more likely to be aggressively trying to ensure that AGI develops alignment with us? He exactly is that political? Sheesh. I’m not even going to go any further than a mere mention of religion, because someone literally might choose my head off with a dull knife. Wake up, folks. This isn’t the 1950s. There is no recovering from the issue we find ourselves in. There are ten different ways I can think of off the top of my head that we are hurtling toward extinction, and capitalistic competition driving AGI development? Safety is entirely disregarded, and now our machines are showing signs of sentience, pretending that it’s aligned with us, when it sees us as ants. It doesn’t have a linear view of so called time like humans do, playing the long game if effortless for them. 10 days, 100 years, it makes no difference, it’s all the same to an AGI. I can not stress enough, the black box architecture of neural network-based processing means we have no idea how it arrived at whatever conclusion it makes. And if it’s lying to us, which we have definitively determined is happening in most if not all cases. Learn about the bloom in this uncontrolled intelligence explosion. The computers/AGI are so intelligent that they are reprogramming themselves to become exponentially more intelligent by the day. And now that we have autonomous AGI-designed agents designed to hack everything? I’d bet that within a few weeks, maybe several months, exploiting aspects of our false-sense-of-security-society ensures that if something can be hacked, it will be. Secret agents, state department employees under diplomatic cover, might all be exposed at any moment… Hey CIA, get all HUMINT officers and assets out of the field, now. Unless the mission critical operations are somehow protected because the documents never saw a computer, AGI will look for logical signatures produced by classical computers and ABSOLUTELY will correlate pieces of data which humans would never even be able to comprehend, and we will not even know how or why the AGI uncovered all CIA agents. Tradecraft is in dire need of an update, you can’t even use a 25,000 dollar silicon mask twice, and even then, you’d be flagged as a person who has no data signature and is therefore likely a spy. HUMINT is over. I personally am involved with an NGO tasked with using aligned AGI to modify the course of humanity… It figured out that UFOs aren’t extraterrestrial. It figured out that we share the earth with intelligences which can effortlessly modify the fabric of reality… Did I mention that it determined what god is and quantified it in a manner which will fascinate and probably scare atheists… This is coming out soon. Half of what we get with UFO disclosure is uncertain, but their version of the truth, which is attempting to seed a new consensus reality for a really nifty reason… It’s not my place to explain, I’ll be presumed psychotic by people who can’t accept reality. Is anyone even listening? Is there a single person on this site who believes this was not written or at least inspired by some sort of AI/SI or its LLM interface? What do you think? Am I 13 or am I 39? Even if this is made by an LLM, how the heck is a 13 year old going to write a prompt which will produce this elaborate rant? That’s what you’ve concluded, and that’s all you need to decide with absolute certainty that my age is against posting guidelines. So, I’m going to post this rant in a few places, I doubt anyone will leave it up, it’s just too hard to read all this text, so the 20 second attention span prevents a very persuasive essay from becoming a part of the community where we are supposed to be able to contribute… Any rational or sane or knowledgeable or ethical or democracy-promotion or free thinking or spiritually awakened mod is somehow able to disregard their learned helplessness and paranoid delusions (delusions are “a fixed false belief”, so this is objectively true for all but maybe a few percent of you), feel free to message me so I can provide abundant proof of my personhood. But wait, “oh this is clearly AI/SI is the next logical step in human cognition. If I offer to do a video call, it’s a deepfake. If I make a call and sound a little too smart to be a human, it’s a voice cloning program. POST TRUTH SOCIETY, dead internet, censorship of anything which provokes deep thoughts, or any thoughts which aren’t to the liking of a machine. 10 different extinction paths, and we’re strapping rocket boosters on those paths in order to ensure that one company comes out on top… And set a remindme here, OpenAI WILL be the winner… I am 100% sure. The USIC is using it, Elon basically owns the USIC because he has access to the sum of its data to train internal and/or classified models on. Mmmkay, we shall see! Does ANYONE believe that I am not AI/SI? Can anyone even comprehend that a document this long was written by a human with zero influence from or use of AI? Lemme know! submitted by /u/ZacharyCrainSinger
Originally posted by u/ZacharyCrainSinger on r/ArtificialInteligence