This is largely because currently chatgpt with 5.2 is significantly worse at following instructions and the output even when factually correct is poorly constructed. The downside is the that using opus 4.6 regularly probably requires the $100 plan. I haven’t experimented with claude 4.6 enough to tell if it is better than chagpt. This is the first time for me that claude was better as a research assistant. Pretty regularly, I will ask a handful of the exact same questions to gemini, chatgpt, and claude and have tried using both claude and gemini more regularly for research. In the past, chatgpt has always had far fewer hallucinations and more useful responses. With opus 4.6 is the first time, I have found claude to be clearly better and have switched over entirely. Glad this is the case given openAI’s recent behavior. I cancelled my chatgpt plan. submitted by /u/one-wandering-mind
Originally posted by u/one-wandering-mind on r/ArtificialInteligence